What do Wal-Mart and Arne Duncan have in common? Neither understands that it’s all about the wages

Two stories floating around the news media lately both make me want to shake the principal actors and yell in their faces, “Raise wages and you’ll solve the problem.”

The first story involves Wal-Mart’s latest embarrassment—employees in it Canton, Ohio store organized a Thanksgiving food drive for fellow workers.  This act of charity—by and for employees only—begged the question that pundits, labor leaders, left-leaning actors and supporters of the minimum wage are all asking: Does Wal-Mart pay its employees too little money?

The Canton food drive for Wal-Mart employees came on the heels of a report by Demos, the liberal think tank, that if Wal-Mart had not engaged in a stock buy-back program is recent years, it would have had the money to raise employee salaries by $5.83 an hour and kept the same profit. My only problem with the survey is that it doesn’t attack the profit margin, which is pretty fat for Wal-Mart and could be reduced as another way to pay employees a living wage.

At this point, Wal-Mart’s treatment of its employees has achieved near mythic notoriety in the mainstream and the left-leaning media. The food drive is merely this week’s “Wal-Mart doesn’t pay its employees enough” story. I’m sure many others are as tired as I am of shouting at the paper, TV, radio or computer screen, “Just do the decent thing and raise their salaries to $15 an hour!”

Perhaps not so many people were yelling at  Secretary of Education Arne Duncan the other day when he announced a new public relations campaign by the Department of Education to get more kids to consider careers as school teachers. Other sponsors include the Advertising Council, Microsoft, State Farm Insurance, Teach for America, the nation’s two largest teachers’ unions and several other educational groups. The problem the campaign addresses is that the Baby Boom generation of teachers is beginning to retire and many predict teacher shortages in the future.

If Arne Duncan doesn’t know it, maybe his friends at Microsoft and the multinational advertising agencies involved in the Advertising Council could tell him that it’s a simple matter to attract more—and more competent—people to a job or career. Just offer more money.

I suspect that Duncan is not entirely serious about attracting more people to the teaching profession, given his continued support of charter schools. From day one, the goal of the charter school movement has been to hammer down salaries of teachers by destroying public school unions.  We know that the big money funding the charter school movement doesn’t really care about quality education. Otherwise they would have pulled the plug on charter schools years ago, given that on average charter schools underperform public schools.

The equation is simple:

1. Charter schools pay less

2. Thus, charter schools drive down teachers’ salaries

3. Lower teacher salaries decrease interest in becoming a teacher.

If this esteemed group of government entities, companies and nonprofit organizations really wanted to build the next generation of school teachers, it would be bankrolling a campaign to make union organizing easier and to set high federal wage standards for all school teachers, public and private.

Both these stories come down to people with power scratching their heads and wondering what to do when the answer is standing right in front of them like a large cold and hungry elephant shivering and trumpeting loudly. PAY THEM MORE! It may mean taking a little less in profits, which are currently exorbitant. Or it may mean raising taxes. Doesn’t matter—those with jobs should make enough money to feed their families, and the professionals to whom we entrust our children should not have their decent wages reduced but instead be raised to the same rate at which we pay lawyers, accountants and other professionals. Pay teachers as much as we pay neurosurgeons and top PR execs, and we’ll have more people interested in the profession.

One comment on “What do Wal-Mart and Arne Duncan have in common? Neither understands that it’s all about the wages
  1. Larry says:

    The truly sad part here is that those lawyers and accountants and other professionals of whom you speak are viewed as those who can produce something the public will buy. Their existence generates economy, bottom-line, profit. What’s leftover for those who cannot afford a higher level of service are the public defenders, public service accountants and of course, Walmart. It all starts with the cost of education one must pay in order to achieve a level of professionalism which can generate higher income.

    If I were to put tax money anywhere, it would be in providing adequate education to every man, woman and child in this country through college. Sadly that would make everybody the same and we can’t have that because it would leave nobody to take advantage of and isn’t that what capitalism is all about? You would think it would be to provide a great product at a reasonable and scalable price.

    This American society values ppl like medical doctors and lawyers. Of course not everybody can be a doctor or a lawyer. At least not currently. And who would do the menial work that is required of an optimally functioning society such as garbage collection, sewer maintenance, infrastructure creation and rebuilding if we were all higher educated? You don’t see a lot of wealthy people within their own society performing the routine menial labors that keep them comfortably in their station.

    As far as I’m concerned, anything that adds to the benefit of a society at any level should be regarded at an equal level since those great and small benefit equally. I am a Registered Nurse and I am finally well compensated for the work I do but it certainly did not start off that way. Oddly my edu was inexpensive since I went the diploma route. And the union I’m in doesn’t hurt to grant us a fine compensation, but that’s another discussion entirely.

    But I provide a meaningful and valuable service to humanity. And I’m certain that lawyers whom defend known to them rapists and murderer’s would feel they are doing the same. Anybody wants to feel valued in the work they do and that cannot be better stated then by how that work is compensated.

    Some countries I believe are adopting executive payroll caps at 12 times that of the lowest paid worker in their facility. Think that’s something United States might consider? If that one’s ever brought up in Congress they will be laughed out of the building in 30 seconds flat.

    I believe Star Trek Next-Generation, which created the Ferengi exampled it best what a true capitalist society represents. Profit at expense of those drones who do the work they are directed to do to create this wealth. A pat on the back between themselves upon themselves rationalizes their largess in providing jobs in the first place.

    The upper echelon’s have no intention of allowing the lower echelons to achieve their level of attainment. They feel they’ve earned it they deserve it and the cost to humanity has no bearing upon their conscience. “If I can do it they can do it.” Much easier said than done. Yet for millennia the masses have bespoken their downtrodden condition to no avail. Little do they know the power they hold, i.e. Marie Antoinnette.

    Time will come again soon in this country where the poor shall rise up and rather than bemoan their lot they will take it with the very weapons that those who advocate for freedom and rights have delivered unto them. I can’t wait for this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


10 + thirteen =