My small study may demonstrate that ads for shady products dominate talk radio.

Every media outlet has its share of advertising for shady products that don’t perform as promised.  Colon treatments, male enhancement treatments, hair loss treatments, speculative investments, Internet business ventures that don’t require you to work, companies claiming to help people get out of debt, lump-sum structured settlement companies, companies that sell you incorporation materials or other information readily available for free—these are some of the shady products and services most frequently advertised in print, TV, radio and Internet media.

Now I’m not talking about legitimate products or services for which deceptive claims are made, but those which have no inherent value, are harmful, or for which the value is much less than the inflated price.  Sometimes it’s a fine line: for example, as much as I dislike most of the products for sale on home shopping programs and infomercials, they mostly inhabit the world of the legitimate.  So do ambulance-chasing attorneys, since they perform a legitimate function (except for those whose practice is solely based on taking a third of the client’s money for doing nothing but filing papers and settling with the insurance company).

No, I’m talking about the out-and-out scam products, although some are legal, or at least legal enough.

My perception as a mass media critic is that while the ads for shady products pockmark all media, it is only a big problem for one, and it’s not the Internet! The Internet is a vast unregulated garden of both delights and deceptions, which means you can find just about any and every scam online, but they’re drowning along with everything else in an endless ocean of web pages.  And ads for shady products are also really at the margin of programming in television and print media.

But listening to talk-oriented radio over the past 25 years has always given me the impression that the shady product dominates this media segment to such a degree that if radio stations did what they should, which is to raise the standard of the ads they accept for commercial products and services, then talk radio could not raise enough advertising dollars to support continued broadcast.

To test this hypothesis, I asked my assistant Colette to listen to three local talk radio stations in Pittsburgh for a three-hour period and record all the commercials.  I asked her to listen to the three types of programming that dominate talk radio:

  • Sports talk:  “Mike & Mike,” an immensely popular national morning sports talk show on ESPN.
  • Conservative talk show hosts: The “Rush Limbaugh” show.
  • All-news: An all news radio station that does not broadcast National Public Radio during drive time.

Colette surfed back and forth between the three programming formats, listening to each a total of 60 minutes, so we could get a randomized sense of advertising on talk radio.  To really be sure of the results, though, we would have to listen for many more hours and in more than one market.  And to really drill down into the reality of talk radio advertising, we would have to record the data by type or programming and time of day.

The results of our small test, however, are so stunning, that they just about demonstrate the enormous importance of the scam product to talk radio:

Colette recorded 31 ads during the three hours of listening of which 16 were for scam products and 15 were for legitimate products.  Thus, slightly more than 50% of the revenues produced during this three-hour randomized spin around the universe of talk radio came from scam products and services, including:

  • Debt settlement company #1
  • Debt settlement company #2
  • Debt settlement company #3
  • Unpaid tax settlement  firm #1
  • Unpaid tax settlement firm #2
  • Stock tips by email
  • Lump sum payment for a structured settlement
  • Investing in gold #1
  • Investing in gold #2 (the company with which Glen Beck is associated)
  • Personal identity protection (the company that has been in the news for its shady claims)

What surprised me is that during this listening period, Colette heard no spots making health claims.  My anecdotal memory tells me that those spots mostly run on afternoons, weekends and overnight, but we would have to extend the study to test that hypothesis.

opedge
21 comments on “My small study may demonstrate that ads for shady products dominate talk radio.
  1. Cadogan says:

    Who ever wrote this artcile really knew what they were talking about.

  2. sam says:

    I have to say, you chose your words pretty well. The insight you wrote are well positioned.

  3. Lennie Padron says:

    Once and for all an excellent blog post about the subject, keep up the good work and I wish to examine even more from you in the long run.

  4. wedding pillow says:

    Took me awhile to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be very useful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also engaged! I’m sure you had fun writing this article.

  5. Proactolmart says:

    Keep up the good work.

  6. Isela Mcspirit says:

    This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Many thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.

  7. Paris Lind says:

    Good article, Each and every Place is Fine enough.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.

  8. Fernando Legare says:

    Thanks so much for this great blog; this is the kind of thing that keeps me going through the day. I’ve been looking around for your site after I heard about them from a buddy and was thrilled when I was able to find it after searching for some time. Being a avid blogger, I’m happy to see others taking initiative and contributing to the community. I just wanted to comment to show my appreciation for your work as it’s very encouraging, and many writers do not get the credit they deserve. I am sure I’ll be back and will spread the word to my friends.

  9. Alejandro Tylor says:

    Interesting Write-up with A number of Helpful advises. Thank you very Very much.

  10. Tomi Lehew says:

    Usually I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this article really forced me to do so! Thanks, really nice article.

  11. Lee Iannotti says:

    I found this an informative and interesting post. I think it is very useful and knowledgeable, happy to see some people still have interest in this. I would like to thank you for the work you have made in writing this article. I am wish the same best work from you in the future as well best regards

  12. Dorathy Gervasi says:

    Thanks for the great post.

  13. Damian Nanfito says:

    Thanks again for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  14. Keven Ader says:

    This stuff can get pretty complicated and I don’t understand everything fully. …

  15. I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you for this grat article! Cheers!

  16. This is my first time I have visited your site. I found a lot of interesting stuff in your blog. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one! keep up the great work.

  17. Thanks for the info… i’ll put it to good use 🙂

  18. I wanted to express thanks for this good read!! I absolutely benefited from every little bit of it. I have bookmarked your site to

  19. Sweet, finally a post that fulfills my research. So many people get this topic wrong. You are a great thinker.

  20. I enjoyed the article and thanks because of posting such valuable info in lieu of of all of us to superabundance up, I set up it both cost-effective and revelatory and I ploy to order it as again as I can.

    ray ban 3025

  21. I enjoyed the article and thanks recompense posting such valuable info in predicament of of all of us to skim, I enhance of rise upon it both serviceable and communicative and I bestow to salvage assign to it as again as I can.

    ray ban 3025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

two × 4 =